Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 4:22PM
More about the body
I have spoken about the body and its different members. The body is lots of different members; every bone is connected via a joint. Let’s talk about how these members came together; well how did they if you think we just evolved? How did the bones of the body form separate members and adjoin themselves together to make up the skeleton?
Firstly they are shaped accordingly, their joined together yet they are separate members, like the rest of the body they start off small and grow from a child to an adult. How if we just evolved did bones like the rest of the body learn to grow? Surely if the creatures of the planet just evolved then how does something grow as it does? Firstly in the womb, then continuing to grow until adulthood? Therefore everything firstly develops in the womb, but what formed the womb? Where did the first birth come from?
Therefore evolution did not just form the skeleton; it enabled it to grow into what we call an adult. How did something shape itself and enable itself to grow? Can you name anything else on the planet that has shape to, let’s say a sculptured finish. Is there anything else formed naturally that is so smooth and has shape and definition, the bones don’t even have burs on them. If this is the case then how did they form and shape themselves?
The body is many members, as I have stated. we should all know that everything develops in the womb, but that DNA changes develop over a long periods; changing the creature in some way shape or form according to science. Go beyond the womb and think how the first form of creature developed. If it starts in a womb then surely there must have been a womb from the start, unless the body was formed instantly as stated in the bible.
How many different members does the body have? We can even say the skin to be a member of the body, as all bones are different members, Ears, nose, eyes. Every individual piece of our body is a different member. What part of the body would have formed firstly? It seems impossible that the body could have formed with no help at all, the complexity of the body, just says to me creation.
I would like to try and explain more about the evolutionary period of let’s say the human body, there are many different species of creature on the earth, but if the creature grows from a baby into an adult, with all members working properly. How has this happened?
Did the first car work properly without glitch? No; but it was formed together to make a car; things where shaped and designed also with machinery so that all parts would work, How has the body become so perfect? Where is the machinery to carve the bones and things to shape the ears, nose? Everything on any living creature would need to be shaped and sculpted to enable everything to fit together. Seems impossible that it could form separate members, and work. Balance and grow.
If the skin of a human being has only it's own life span to form; then how did it take millions of years to become skin? It would have aged and died before it could become skin. How did all the joints of the human body not only fit into each other, but have things protecting the joints from wear over the life span of the creature.
It seems that people have accepted the human body to have evolved but how did everything come together and make a body? The intestines, to digest food and the passing of waste, the muscles that enable us to go to the toilet, otherwise when the first creature ate; was it passing waste straight away, was it able to control its bowel movement from the food eaten or did the muscles have to develop.
What about blinking? Not all creatures blink, so why did some creatures blink and some not. How did evolution decide this? What causes some creatures to have eye lids, to enable them to blink? These are valid questions, which somebody will probably try to give an answer too. This is just a simple question that says creation rather than evolution.
God may be a mystery more to some than others, but look at our bodies. How could they have just evolved? Look at the ins and outs of everything, that the body could not have evolved; it seems easier to think that it just appeared from nothing. As it says in the bible we are created of the dust of the earth, this would have been instant and makes more sense that God himself gave the bodies to our being.
I just can’t see how we just evolved, it does not make sense to me that the body only having a short life span could evolve over millions of years; and also all components of the body actually even form over millions of years.
It seems easier to say that God wherever he comes from whatever he is, would be the father of all creation, because as the bible says he has always been, this is hard to comprehend that something could always have been from the beginning of what? But if he is actually millions of years old then it seems truer that everything has come from him because he has had time to form beyond anything else that is considered life. That actually everything else would come from him. The human body only lives a short time; it could not have just evolved.
Anyway try and assess how many different members to the body there are, are the lips a different member, why do we have lips, something has come to mind about the eyes. Why are they sensitive to light and drugs? Otherwise why does the pupil dilate at different times?
There are many things in this blog that people take for granted, like colour and the body of the species, and as I have just stated the eye; well the pupil dilates at different times usually due to light. How did something evolve to allow different strengths of light to enter? Why does the eye do this? Has it always done this? Or did it adapt over millions of years to do this? So where people blind before they could see?
Makes sense that if the eye ball evolved then in some way shape or form the species would have been blind as the eye developed, seems impossible to me that the body of any species could evolve over millions of years. For instance about the eye; how could the body have fed itself if it could not see? Therefore whatever formed without sight would not have been able to see the food and would have starved; another amazing fact is the eye is the only member of the body that does not grow, it is the same size from birth to death, how did this happen?
Many components of the body also say that they would have been perfectly formed from the beginning, like the stomach and the bowels, one need the other to be able to function. The womb would have been needed to give birth. So it seems the body could not have formed over millions of years as there would have been parts not working, and could not have formed living life, as the first birth would have needed food in the womb, everything must have been together before the first birth occurred. This also says that the first born must be millions of years old if you believe we have evolved without a God.
How did the stomach work without the bowels, so the bowels and stomach must have evolved together if u thinks we evolved? Many members need another member to enable the other member to work. This is why the body must have been formed instantly.
Reader Comments (3)
I hope this article is a joke...if so it is hilarious. If not then I suggest this site: www.talkorigins.org. Or literally any science book.
Your article is correct. The first life form would have diied within hours and could not have lived long enough to evovlve.
I agree with the first comment. I hope this article is a joke, and if not... Find a science book—read it.
You can even go to an elementary school and ask a student very nicely if they could please explain prokaryotic cells to you. Then learn about protists. Then you can look up nebulae. Now, once you've done that you should look up Habitable Zones. Then look up natural forces, like volcanic eruptions—what the heck, go on and look up magma, even gravity (which you should have learned about when looking up nebulae). Now, look up atoms; protons, neutrons, and electrons, to be simple. Then learn the Periodic Table of Elements.
You'll then know all about the introduction of water. Now you can review prokaryotes.
After that, you should look into the tectonic plates—the book should explain Pangaea. Now remember what you learned about magma and tectonic plates; continental drift explains earthquakes and the modern position of the landmasses. Check out migration, it's a pretty simple process, actually, and you may have heard of it—and if you're not a plant, you've probably already done it!
This may be overwhelming.
Evolution helps with that—defense mechanisms aren't just physical, you know, it's a benefit of evolution. Ever heard of psychology...? It's a very interesting branch of science, if you believe in that... Unless you think your computer runs on magic?
Listen, there have been hundreds of years of research and experiments devoted to cultivating evidence for evolution, and they've found it. Scientists can even observe microscopic evolution today and the only reason why it is still a theory is because we haven't officially observed macroscopic evolution, which we really couldn't do since we we're too primitive to witness and record our brain functioning and physiological changes at the time—we didn't watch it happening.
While I'm normally not rude to anyone's beliefs, I personally find it insulting when you posted this article without researching the topic you were writing about; it's an insult to two-hundred-thousand years homo sapiens sapiens advancement from small hunting and gathering groups to vast civilizations that eventually bring us to the present where we have done such extraordinary things with science that our ancestors would have wept in amazement. And would have, if they hadn't died from shock, lived well past forty years from health care and sanitation advancements.
You can seriously push down plastic buttons, watch them with your eyes (Please try looking into eukaryotes. And don't forget mitosis and meiosis, DNA, RNA, codons and anti-codons... From there you can go to embryology. But I suppose you're too arrogant to believe that humans are actually animals that have a few neat evolutionary advantages over our fellow multi-cellular organisms?), see an image appear upside-down in your retina from electromagnetic waves, have your brain then flip the image right-side up and fill in all the holes that are actually there, and then interpret tiny symbols created by those ancestors that you've insulted, understand it as language, specifically English, astoundingly comprehending meaning from those meager symbols and images and interpret it—you're reading this, you are sitting there breathing, feeling so incredibly insulted by this comment that you cannot even see reason.
Did you know that if a person's heart rate increases to over a certain level they are no longer reasonable, that with that heart rate they will not listen to any reasonable agreements that another person has to offer?
That's happening to you right now isn't it?
Try researching domestication. You’ll find that sheep came first, and that dogs came from wolves twelve thousand years ago.
Don’t get me wrong—I’m Catholic (albeit I haven’t been to religion since fourth grade, six years ago... Still, I made my communion, and I believe in God, kind of... maybe I’m agnostic), so it’s not as though I’m bashing Christianity, I just think that your blatant disregard for the life’s works of some of the greatest minds is very offensive; it makes you seem ungrateful to your ancestors that you did not even consider the possibility—but I suppose you just see computers as God’s work, don’t you, with no credit to humans who were incredibly innovated and determined?
What? God couldn’t have created protists, that eventually evolved into us...? He couldn’t have caused nebulae to form that would eventually cause a planetesimals to form into a planet that happened to be in a Habitable Zone that would allow water to form, that would create protists from all the gases, then form after millions of years into multi-cellular organisms? I just don’t understand you’re perspective at all, and this is coming from a girl who actually read the Old Testament. Have you also not even considered the fact that the Bible was written by humans, not God, and that it’s been rewritten, revised, translated, over and over and over again? Remember, the victors write history—alright, that may be going a bit far, but still... you should look at all the possibilities. Who's to say that the writers of the Bible didn't lie, exaggerate, play on words, use symbolism that was lost in history and was interpreted incorrectly by historians, the Jews and Christians for hundreds of years?
Remember, I may not have written down the best way to go about researching evolution, but any beginners science book written in this time period should be able to explain it.
I apologize first for how rude and horrible this comment is. This was not meant to insult you or anyone else based off their religion, merely a way to blow off my frustration of the lack of research, especially when you have the internet at your disposal. Secondly, I apologize for how long this is... And, lastly, I'm sorry that I didn't edit this, so it may not even make any sense at all...