The intelligence of evolution. evolved or created?
Saturday, December 26, 2009 at 8:31AM When did our teeth evolve?
What about our teeth; how and why did they evolve? As we would have had to have eaten from the beginning; as everything eats to survive? For the teeth to have evolved then the knowledge of food must have come from somewhere for the teeth to evolve; as they would have to have formed before the consumption of food, therefore pre conceding what they where going to be used for, if they then formed after the consumtion of food then how did the teeth form knowing there purpose? Did evolution decide teeth were needed for the consuption of food?
Were would the knowledge have come from to eat certain foods. Adam and eve ate, as they where created by God, they ate from the fruit of trees so at least the bible states at the beginning of creation that there was food available, which explains a lot more than you think.
How could we have eaten if we evolved? There would have been nothing to eat. The first human would have probably been eaten by an animal. Where did the animal come from? I can only presume if you think we evolved we would have had very little knowledge and would have been wiped out by the more ferocious animals.
What food would have been eaten firstly?
It seems impossible to me that there would have been anything to eat from the beginning, if you say we evolved. Also why would our insides have evolved to eat food for survival? Why did the planet decide we would have to live on what it would give us to eat? How through evolution did anything decide we would eat, how did the planet know it had food for the survival of the species that ate food?
if you ask me everybody would have starved, depending on how you say that multiple beings evolved from cells, seems impossible to me that we evolved; Its just ignorance.
What decided we would need baby teeth?
Why if we evolved do we have baby teeth? What is the point of having baby teeth? And how could evolution have decided that we would need teeth? Never mind baby teeth. What is the point of baby teeth? Just that they fall out to make way for the adult teeth. Even though we do need our teeth to eat.
What decided; if we evolved, that we would need our teeth or any part of our insides. Like our lungs, taste buds, or our teeth? This would therefore mean that the cell that apparently formed life knew it would need teeth to chew it's food,so therefore the cell must have had intelligence as to what it was going to form into before it formed, knowing it would need teeth.
The tongue would have had to have known it was going to speak therefore the tongue could not have evolved because it would have been needed from the beginning to speak, otherwise the tongue pre conceded what it would do before it evolved.
As I have stated before; evolution evolves too something as well as from something. How could the tongue have evolved too something, it must have already known its use before it evolved or how could it evolve too anything if it did not know it's purpose. It had nothing to evolve too, like the nose would have evolved too a smell and the hearing to hear a sound, the tongue therefore had nothing to evolve too.
If we evolved what decided we need baby teeth and why? How could evolution decide anything? If evolution decided we need something there must be intelligence behind evolution.
The planet must be a living thing, and that’s a fact. Does it not seem easier to think that God is the intelligence behind creation? Even if you think we evolved; intelligence must have been there as to decide what the human race would need and want? And the intelligence would still be there; creating us through evolution. If evolution started; it has never stopped.
How did evolution know about smell?
There could not have been many smells about if we formed from a cell. What came first? The smell, the hearing, the voice, what came first, the smell or the nose? But it does sound amazing that God put the smells to the nose, the sound for the hearing, and the voice as to the speech. Also, what do we really see? Though the eyes are there to see, what do we really see? What would the first set of eyes have seen? Not much; must have been a lonely sight! They must have seen trees and they must have had lungs; as the trees enable us to breathe,
Could the eyes see straight away with good sight, or would it have been poor? surely then the skeleton must have formed firstly, giving space for the different members. Where then there people walking around with no eyes? did the skeleton have flesh straight away? What part of the body would have formed firstly?
Would the brain have been there from the beginning? As the brain is the central processing unit of the whole body. As a computer; even though has a central processing unit; it still needs other parts to work; as the brain needs all members. What would be the point of the brain? If it where not for the arms and legs and our movements.
We walk, talk, communicate, and our brain has to process so many things at once, just like a computer multi tasks so do we. Where did the intelligence come from that enabled us to multi task; and the intelligence to make something that multi tasks also? Like a computer.
How could we have just evolved? Have a good think; and know that God exists! If God did not create us then what decided what we need, to survive? If we evolved, there must be some sort of intelligence in evolution? Else why would we eat now and not from the beginning, what sort of foods where available to keep life living, or did many people evolve at once eating the other life that they could see? Where did the first life forms come from? its hard to think that we just evolved.
What came first? Water or plant life?
I stated that trees would have been the first thing that the eyes would have seen. How would that be possible?
Let me explain! Water is H2o, hydrogen and oxygen. Trees and plant life according to science produces 98% of the world’s oxygen
The trees and plant life would have had to have been there to form the oxygen that fused with the hydrogen to form the water. The trees would have needed water to grow. Therefore the trees needed water to grow.
There could not have been any water to make the trees grow; because there where no trees and plant life to form the oxygen needed to form the water.
The trees and plant life needed something that could not have been there without each other, and the water could not have been there without the trees and plant life. Science has already told us that 98% of the earths oxygen comes from plant life, how will they answer this one?
Evolution has an error; somebody must have put the water there, and the trees and plant life. Hydrogen and oxygen must have been fused together by somebody to form the water.
Just say the water was there then where did 2% of oxygen come from and how did it create so much water upon the earth? Without water we would not exist, as all life is created by water.
Because plant life produces 98% of the world’s oxygen and the water would have enabled the plant life to grow. How was it possible that we also are created by H2o? How did the first humans if we evolved eating, because the probability of any forms of food would have been miniscule? We all need water.
Where would the water have come from to enable us to form? As without water nothing would have formed. Without the oxygen water would not have existed, one could not exist without the other.
Theoretically evolution is wrong, somebody could come up with a theory that through the big bang water somehow without the oxygen fused together creating the seas, science has already told us that 98% of the worlds oxygen comes from plant life, they must have missed this fact. The question is if you believe we evolved then what came first the plant life or the water?
If you say the water came before the trees then how did we breathe? As there would have been no trees, and there could have been no trees without the water, and no water without the oxygen from the trees.
Theoretically you will say water came first, then the trees, then us as things upon part with the creation. You may say that the first forms of oxygen came from rocks, but science states that 98% of the earths oxygen comes from trees and plant life. Therefore 2% of the earth’s oxygen comes from rock. Is science going to retract that the earth was formed from 2% oxygen as 98% came from the plant life and the plant life could not exist without water?